![]() Israel imposed a strict blockade on Gaza, tightly restricting the flow of goods and people in and out of the territory, entrenching the military occupation. ![]() Since then, things have been worse for Israelis and (especially) Palestinians. But in 2007, following tensions with the official Palestinian leadership, the militant faction Hamas took control of the strip by force. In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew its troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip - a policy called “disengagement” that was designed, in theory, to remove Israel from direct management of the Palestinian-populated territory. The only real way to prevent this kind of thing from happening is for the two sides to come to a mutually agreeable solution that addresses the root causes of violence.Įxcept today, any solution seems further away than ever. So long as Israel rules over the Palestinian population, violence will be ongoing and escalation inevitable. Though we can’t be sure why Hamas chose to launch this attack now, we do know that there are a number of background conditions - including not just the ongoing occupation but also recent surges of conflict in Jerusalem and the West Bank, a far-right Israeli government, and Israeli-Saudi negotiations about normalizing relations - that made the situation especially combustible.Īnd this leads to a second, more fundamental point: The conflict is not, as some have suggested, “stable” - and likely never can be made so. We can start by examining the conditions that made it possible. We’ll try to answer your questions in an upcoming story. This choice sounds more natural and less formal to most native English speakers.Do you have questions about the history of the Israeli-Palestinian relations? So you would ask, “You talked to whom?”Īll of that said, in informal speech and writing, speakers will often opt for who where whom has traditionally been used. For example: You talked to who/whom? It would be incorrect to say, “You talked to he?”, but saying, “You talked to him?” makes grammatical sense. If the more natural substitute is he, then go with who. ![]() When in doubt, substitute him (sometimes you’ll have to rephrase the sentence) and see if that sounds right. Whom also commonly appears when it follows a preposition, as in the salutation “To whom it may concern.” Does it concern he? No. For example, the package was given to someone. That is the person on the receiving end of the action. In these sentences, whom functions as an indirect object. My brother doesn’t remember whom he e-mailed the questions.Whom is the direct object in all three sentences. In the other examples, whom is being loved and hired. In the first sentence, whom is being seen here, not doing the seeing. The cook, whom we just hired, failed to show up to work today.His grandchildren, whom he loves so much, are in town for a visit.See how whom acts as an object in each of these instances: Like me, him, her, us, and them, whom is the object of a verb or preposition. Similarly, who called and who baked in the other examples. Who is doing the rescuing in the first sentence. See how who is used as a subject in different ways: Who, like I, he, she, we, and they, is used as the subject of a sentence. Who is a subjective-case pronoun, meaning it functions as a subject in a sentence, and whom is an objective-case pronoun, meaning it functions as an object in a sentence. The two-as you’ll recall from English class-are related and may seem interchangeable. If whom is on the decline, then who must be growing in popularity. Understanding when and how to use this pronoun can set your writing apart. ![]() Despite its waning use in speech and ongoing speculation about its imminent extinction, whom still holds a spot in the English language, particularly in formal writing. Over the last 200 years, the pronoun whom has been on a steady decline.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |